When following a narrative, the audience does not simply
route for whichever character is the most moral; rather, they respond to cues
present in the way the story is told that inform them how to feel. To use the Pirates of the Caribbean films as an
example – which, despite approaching the theme with a completely different tone
and purpose, is comparable to Captain
Phillips in that it also centres around pirates – we root for Captain Jack
thanks to his charm, centrality to the story and the film’s light-hearted feel,
and in spite of the fact her steals ships with little regard for the safety of
others.
All too often, serious, Oscar-baiting films that are ‘based
on a true story’ present the divide between the moral Americans we’re to root
for and the threatening foreigners we’re to hope are defeated in oversimplified
shades of black and white. Two recent examples that were particularly honoured
during awards season are Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. Neither film bothers
to humanise its Arabic characters, instead expressing sole interest in the
American perspective and how its threat can be overcome. Such films encourage
us to cheer an American hero, without ever tackling the moral intricacies of
the wider context.
Based on some of the trailers, you’d be forgiven for
assuming that Captain Phillips (which
is currently 16-1 to win best picture at the Oscars) is more of the same. Tom
Hanks plays the titular seaman, who kisses goodbye to his wife before taking to
the sea to captain a ship transporting cargo along the Arabian Sea. Panic
ensues when a group of Somali pirates hijack the ship, with their leader Abduwali
Abdukhadir ‘Skinny’ Muse (played enticingly by amateur Barkhad Abdi)
pronouncing himself as the new captain.
Once again, foreigners are
presented as a blood-thirsty rabble of ‘Others’, hell-bent on wreaking misery
on innocent American lives, specifically that of the renowned decent figure of
Tom Hanks. Thankfully, the film itself is more nuanced than this. Aside from
its obvious virtues of being a gripping, exceedingly tense affair that does not
let up for the whole of its full two hour, fifteen minute running time, Captain Phillips displays a sincere
interest in the Somali captors. After the central concerns of ‘what’s going to
happen next?’ and ‘Is everyone going to be OK?’ the main question prompted by
the film is ‘What are the pirates’ motives?’
Some explanations are given in an
early, pre-hijacking scene that depicts the difficult environment of their
home, watched over by a war lord. More answers are offered in the brief, considered
exchanges between Phillips and Muse, most tellingly, and potentially eye-opening
to particularly naive audiences, when Phillips implores that ‘there’s got to be
something other than being a fisherman or kidnapping people’; to which Muse
replies, ‘maybe in America’.
Blink and you’d miss these
moments, especially among the frenetic chaos that pervades most of the film,
but they’re crucial in establishing an even-handed moral core and political
context to the hijacking. In them, Muse gains a voice, and is able to express
his point of view that he was forced into pirating ships after Western
companies ruined his shipping business. His predicament certainly puts into
perspective Phillips’ concerns that his kids won’t find it as easy to climb the
job ladder as he did.
Still, more could be done in the
name of balancing both sides. Throughout the ordeal we are constantly reminded
that Phillips’ primary concern is his family, while none of the Somalis’
relations are even mentioned. And neither does the film compromise on setting
up its protagonist as a noble, morally sound and self-sacrificial hero, even
though reports suggest that the real life Phillips was far from such a
straightforward good guy.
Greengrass’ trademark use of
shaky-cam - that exhibits a claim to naturalism – and the self-important ‘based
on a true story’ statement that features prominently on the poster should,
therefore, be treated with as much scepticism as any film like this;
regardless, Captain Phillips still
deserves to be commended for showing sympathy towards its villains and
contextualising their situations, and scenes of impending terror like the
hijacking of the ship are some of this year’s most successfully realised action
set pieces.
But Hollywood is still crying out
for films bold enough to seriously question the misdeeds of its own nation,
rather than yet more stories featuring innocent American victims. Sure, Captain Phillips was a true story, but
it’s hardly representative of a common trend in reality; this U.S. cargo ship
was the first to be hijacked in two centuries. Is it too much to ask for a
Hollywood film to focus on the far greater number of victims of U.S. foreign
policy?
No comments:
Post a Comment