The continued success of Locke,
currently playing for a third week in cinemas, demonstrates just how much
dramatic action can be generated through the humble telephone. Despite being
set entirely in Tom Hardy’s car as he makes his way along the motorway to the
birth of his child, the universe of the film is expanded to introduce multiple
characters and action occurring off-screen thanks to the hands-free phone he
spends the whole 90 minutes speaking into. Following in the footsteps of Phone Booth and Buried, it manages to tell a story with twists and pathos, all
while retaining the sense of claustrophobia of a refined space that the film
does not once escape.
Films like these may be in the extreme with regard to their
reliance on the telephone, but the device – so omnipotent that we barely notice
it – plays a vital role in countless films.
With less than twenty years separating Alexander Graham
Bell’s first words on a telephone and the first ever motion picture hosted by
the Lumiere brothers, the histories of cinema and the telephone has always been
entwined, with the changing nature of telecommunications shaping the way
stories on film are told.
Though appearances were scarce in the silent era as the
phone had yet to be established as commonplace in the average household, as
soon as people could talk in films they were talking over the phone. As demonstrated
by a running joke in the original Scarface,
which has the eponymous character’s secretary persistently fail at working the
telephone before eventually shooting it in frustration (a great gag of overcompensation
replicated in Star Wars some 45 years
later: (http://tinyurl.com/cdjosep)the
phone was still unreliable in its relative infancy.
But by the fast-talking screwball comedies of the 1930s and
40s, telephones were used effectively to facilitate the relentless pace of the
dialogue. Most of His Girl Friday
consists of Rosalind Russell and Cary Grant successively picking up and
slamming down phones (http://tinyurl.com/oj3h85m),
while the discrepancy between what
a character thinks is going on down the other end of the line and what we see
really happening is often exploited for
laughs, as in Brining Up Baby when
Katherine Hepburn pretends to be attacked by a leopard.
Though it is often
said how comic actors need other talented performers to bounce off, many of
cinema’s funniest scenes derive from actors talking at a telephone. The
aforementioned Cary Grant was particularly good at this, while the comic genius
Peter Sellers flourished with the sole control over his scene in Dr Strangelove as the US president
talking to his (unheard) Russian counterpart.
Whether or not we can hear the recipient of a call is one of
the subtle but significant ways in which action is shaped. While scenes like
Sellers’s above– and those that utilise that distinct tinny sound to denote
someone’s voice over the phone - keep the focus on the actor, instances
when we witness both ends of the line help expand a story’s scope. This use of
montage and the possibility of being in multiple places at once is one of the main things that set
cinema apart from the theatre, and the phone is a particularly practical means of
jumping from one scene to another in just a moment.
Phones not only give characters access to others far away, but also provide a more depersonalised form of contact, which helps us explain how Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke are more candid to each other when talking through pretend phones in Before Sunrise (http://tinyurl.com/krrywun ). There is a certain comfort talking to someone who you know to be far away, and horror films have many times tapped into the terrifying scenario where that buffer is breached: in Nightmare on Elm Street Freddy Kruiger’s tongue somehow bursts out of the receiver, while phone calls in Lost Highway and Scream become unbearably tense once it transpires that the voice on the other end is not where we thought it was http://tinyurl.com/kdx9m3v , http://tinyurl.com/mlrcnn2 .
Even outside the horror genre, the phone provides dramatic
situations not possible in everyday talk – the abrupt hang up, the unanswered
call and the ignored call all carry great dramatic weight. The very sound of
phone ringing is enough to unsettle us as viewers conditioned to answering it,
and certainly ramps up the tension in this scene out of No Country for Old Men.
Mobiles have, as
satirised in this scene in Scott Pilgrim
vs the World ( http://tinyurl.com/mrudsvb), hugely sped up the time it takes to get in touch with one another, and as such have had big consequences on the way
action unfolds. For instance, it now seems too contrived to have a character
unable to track down another given the ubiquity of phones. The Departed, with its constant phoning, texting and
double-crossing, is perhaps the finest example of a thriller in the age of
mobiles, with twists in the plot occurring relentlessly as characters are able
to access vital information at the press of a button.
While Bourne documents contemporary technology at government-level, this year’s Her
draws upon the smartphone to critique modern day private lives, envisioning a
near future where phones have dominated our lives so much that a romantic
relationship is possible with them. The protagonist’s deep understanding is far away from the comical ignorance of the secretary in Scarface – by now phone technology has engulfed our whole lives.
Phones have, therefore, always been a part of the movies,
but perhaps never so much as they are today. Both Her and Locke could both
even be considered in their own distinct ‘Phone Film’ genre, given how their very essence are concentrated within the device. With phones more
omnipresent than ever, expect many more films in the future to be shaped entirely by a phone.
No comments:
Post a Comment